5 Comments »

Back in the day, not that long ago, record labels served four distinct needs for the artists they signed, without which it was impossible to have a meaningful career out of performing original music:

Production: They paired artists with songwriters and producers and gave them money to record records in big, expensive studios that sometimes took months or even years to make;

Distribution: Once the record was made, they loaded up millions of copies in trucks and shipped those records to all the important retailers. Their tight relationships with all the important retailers (Tower, HMV, Virgin, etc.) basically guaranteed them all important shelf space. No distribution meant no sales;

Promotion: They hired publicists and radio promoters and got the word out there about the record and the artist through interviews in major newspapers, ensured heavy rotation in major market radio stations, and got the video played on MTV. It was unlikely that an artist would ever find an audience without radio airplay, MTV support, or a big publicity campaign;

Professional Connections (Touring & Publishing): They helped artists promote the record by pairing them up with an agent that helped them get on the road to build an audience. Labels also helped artists by hooking them up with publishers (often in-house) which in turn connected them with film music supervisors, advertising agency execs etc. to further each artist’s earning potential and hence the money that the label made from their investment;

Just a quick glance at the four areas I describe above, show you that the cost of offering these services was enormous (it took an army of people and a boat-load of money to get past all the gatekeepers), which meant that in order to recoup one’s investment the sales needed to be equally high.

But in the past few years three major internet-enabled shifts have taken place that have effectively brought down this entire ecosystem:

1.    The digitization of music has made it possible for recorded music to be distributed online, for next to nothing, leading to commodization and the expectation that it should be free;

2.    Audiences, spurred on by the abundance of music on the net, have shifted their tastes away from mass-marketed, mass-selling artists, to more personally-discovered, niche-reaching music (major label CD sales are down by more than 45% since 1999);

3.    The internet has entirely evaporated the cost related to offering these services hence eroding the fundamental value proposition of the average label (witness the demise of many recording studios and large scale record retailers) but labels, caught with the baggage that legacy brings have been unable to move quickly to adapt;

I’ll talk more in Part 2 next week about how these changes have contributed to the rise of a whole new class of artists that I call the “Artistic Middle Class”  — and how these artists are using the net and their low-cost advantage to totally remake the music market.

Panos

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
5 Responses to “The Empowered Artist’s Tool Kit Part 1: Labels are Unnecessary”
 

I’ve been saying this for a long time. The gates are open and there is a flood of music available now. That small garage band in Sydney, Australia can get to an audience in Detroit, Michigan with little overhead.

I tend to think that fewer people will be able to make a living off of their music, as there is so much choice, the market will fragment. A consumer with $100/month to spend will spread it out — the pie will remain the same, but hundreds or thousands more artists will split it.

I’ll look forward to more of your comments about the ecosystem.

Z. Mulls wrote on August 22nd, 2008 at 1:47 pm

 

I understand what you are saying, but what about marketing? Doesn’t it still cost a large chunk of money to actually get your music out there in front of people (ie featured artist slots, internet ads)? Or do you think word of mouth brings the cream to the top…

Jamie

Jamie Strange wrote on August 23rd, 2008 at 1:09 am

 

I agree with what is said about how it was done, but I’m not sure that the gates are open. Present music is at a new MTV low. There is no new voices coming thru. Music is basically boring. Who is out doing live shows (50 year old bands). There is no music that makes you think, everyone tries to sound like someone else. Even MTV can’t show a full video as they are now showing 20 second clips. A D D is becoming the flavor of choice and I’m seeing this in music. The problem is that it is no longer about the music and if it is not about the music then what is it about?

M G F wrote on August 23rd, 2008 at 8:52 am

 

Jamie,
I will address your comment in a longer post but I do not believe that good marketing needs to cost a lot of money (I’ve experienced this my self with Sonicbids). Effective marketing for me has less to do with money and more to do with the willingness to experiment, developing a good gut, and fully leveraging the internet to spread the word. And of course, having a good thing to sell to begin with.

Panos

Panos Panay wrote on August 23rd, 2008 at 1:09 pm

 

M G F-

I most definitely feel you, but I wouldn’t say that ALL music is necessarily boring. But we’re almost there — I’ve all but given up on all music television (VH1 is still occasionally good for silly reality television) and conventional radio. I think the problem does have to do with what the American people want, and what record execs/marketing guys can sell to the American people.

It’s not to say that good, thought-provoking music isn’t out there — satellite radio is pretty good for that. Local band shows are even better. It really seems to come down to publicity and marketing, how much bands are willing to spend and/or innovate to get their stuff out there. My band is actually dealing with that exact dilemma right now — and we’re starting to learn that there are much cheaper ways to get out there than dealing with a record label, getting our CD in retail stores, and all that jazz. I’ll agree with everything Panos just said because of what I’ve learned as a bass player in a prog band.

-brandon

Brandon Green wrote on August 24th, 2008 at 7:04 pm

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated to prevent spam and keep the conversation constructive.
Please allow some time for the comment to post