8 Comments »

Michael Jackson was world-famous because he was supremely talented. He sold 120 million records across the planet because, simply put, he made great music. He was by all accounts an exceptionally hard-working perfectionist; he wrote some of the best-known songs of all time; he was a shrewd businessman; and he pioneered moves that have changed the face of modern dance. Michaeljacksonthrilleralbum

Michael Jackson was also the last superstar of his kind. He was the last in a lineage that can be traced all the way back to Bing Crosby and Frank Sinatra; then Elvis; The Beatles; and finally Michael. They are all entertainers that changed both the way that we listen to music but also pushed cultural and societal boundaries to a whole new level.

Michael Jackson single-handedly gave rise to the hit-driven, superstar-centric music business of the late-70’s and 80’s. If you think about it, when most of us think of the “music business” we think of the one that Michael Jackson created: mega-selling albums; lavish music videos that get played non-stop on MTV; consecutive Billboard Chart-topping singles; songs that get endlessly played on cross-format radio; stadium-filling tours with huge productions; superstars that collaborate with consumer brands to promote colas or cars or clothing. In other words, everything that I often declare as an anachronism on this blog.

In a funny way though, Michael Jackson also helped give rise to the concept of the modern, empowered artist. He was the first artist to really demand and get complete control of all aspects of his career: he wrote his own songs; he co-produced his own music; had complete oversight of the way he was marketed; chose his directors and had total creative control of his videos; negotiated by all accounts some of the most favorable recording deals ever; understood the value of owning your music publishing when Madonna was still a drummer in a New York underground band called “The Breakfast Club”; and knew that in the end, the only thing that matters, is your relationship with your fans (all this in a pre-Twitter, pre-Facebook era).

Michael Jackson’s death (on my birthday of all days) represents the formal passing of the Superstar era. There will never be another Michael Jackson just like there will never be another Beatles, not because great music is not created every single day today but because the era of the mass market is over. (Music today influences us as a collective force, rather than an individual one.)

It’s worth remembering though, that besides giving birth to the music business of the big, bloated budgets and hit-obsessed labels, Michael Jackson also helped create the concept of the artist as a proactive entrepreneur.

Here’s to you Michael, the world’s first empowered artist.

Panos

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]
8 Responses to “End of the Music Superstar Era”
 

Thanks for the thoughts on our beloved MJ, Panos.

Tess (a true MJ fan) wrote on June 29th, 2009 at 9:18 am

 

Thanks for the kudos to MJ! Refreshing, given that the media is totally blasting him–and he really deserves recognition for his tremendous contribution to music!

That said, just curious about “full speed ahead?” They were so rabid, and then just dropped out of sight…Wish I knew how it got resolved…

supercitizen wrote on July 4th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

 

Perfectly worded. Thanks for taking the time, Panos. -M

Martin Case wrote on July 7th, 2009 at 3:53 pm

 

I love that you recognize that MJ is the last of the Superstar Era. I’ve been saying this for the last decade. I always use him as an example when explaining to the upcoming R&B artist that you have to lead and be innovative; think of Michael Jackson. He was unique and always going above and beyond. Although he’s the greatest, I think that Madonna, Janet Jackson, Whitney, and Mariah are superstars so there’s still some left. Unfortunately, if this new Gen X doesn’t understand what’s needed to come close to MJ it will be lost.

Nonetheless, I have faith in the new kids coming up; there’s a savant out there – we just have to recognize and support him/her.

Job well done on this article!

Tishea E wrote on July 10th, 2009 at 11:54 am

 

It was his ultimate control that finally killed him, He was surrounded by hangers on who enabled Michael to spin out of control. Its a tragedy and the enablers deserve to be prosicuted.

Britney Spears was on her way down when people intervened, it was too late for Michael.

Barry wrote on July 10th, 2009 at 12:02 pm

 

Agree and disagree. American Idol will continue to pump out the traditional pop stars and there will continue to be a huge audience for the most talented singers/dancers. Even if it is not on the scale of Jacko, it’s still a mass market product with huge budgets. I can see an artist like Justin Timberlake appealing to this audience for many years.

I agree in that we already have much more exposure to really good musicians. There are so many that competition is tougher than ever. This is all good news for the fans: higher supply of good talent, more intimate venues and more direct artist contact.

It still comes down to good acts running their business as efficiently/effectively as possible – same as ever. The pie is growing, and pop artists will continue to get a huge slice. At the same time, there are way more slivers of the pie for indie artists.

Nick Ratliff wrote on July 10th, 2009 at 1:18 pm

 

P:

No big thing, but I am confused…

I think I know what you mean when you say the “mass market is over.” However, I’m really lost on what you mean by the sentence in the parentheses: “(Music today influences us as a collective force, rather than an individual one.)”

How are you tying in “influence,” “collective force,” and “individual?” I want to understand what you mean by collective force, because to me, that somehow implies, or is close to, the concept of a mass market.

Maybe you mean ONE individual will likely not have that much market reach ever again.

And while I agree that music influences “us,” so too do the marketers behind it!

Ok, thanks!!!

Christine Cochran wrote on July 10th, 2009 at 11:35 pm

 

Christine, you are spot on. What I mean is that music is an even bigger part of our lives than it was in the past. The difference is that we get that music from a significantly larger number of artists than before. Less depth, more breadth.

Panos wrote on July 15th, 2009 at 6:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Comments are moderated to prevent spam and keep the conversation constructive.
Please allow some time for the comment to post